It said the dog saved the woman’s life so it’s pretty understandable for her to want her dog back.
Also, are pit bulls the only kind of dogs that are dangerous?
Humans are the most dangerous animal on earth right now.
Why is it wrong for a dog to kill a human, but not wrong for humans to kill millions of pigs, chickens and cows?

I think I got a little carried away, but my point is if she has the money to do it, I think she can.
Before talking about selfishness, sell your computer and donate money to homeless dogs.

Personally, I don’t think it will be the same dog when it is cloned, so I’m wondering if they could clone memory cells.

Dr. Randall Lockwood’s own article on the ethology of canine aggression admits that pit bulls are less affected by pain, are more tenacious in attacking their victims, and have suppressed external body language hints of its rising levels of aggression and pending attacks, lending to what Dr. Lockwood refers to as “suprise attacks” upon victims. Dr. Lockwood’s work has explained why pit bull breeders and fighters, for hundreds of years, have developed the ultimate weapon for dog fighting. Pit bulls have been intentionally selected for breeding to enhance their probability of engagin in specific behaviors that are desired in dog fighting - specifically biting their victim and holding that bite, and then shaking their head back and forth ripping and tearing of the victim. Medical doctors in Texas, and the Coroner of Detroit Michigan have studied the injuries inflicted upon human victims of pit bull maulings, and have described these injuries as unique amongst dog bite victims, drawing the analogy to injuries seen only on victims of shark attacks.

As an attorney, I have had the opportunity to be involved in litigation over pit bull bans and have consulted dozens of local government officials over this rational response to attacks upon their citizens they are sworn to protect. There is no doubt that a well written local ordinance is constitutional as a valid exercise of local government’s police powers, and that using Dr. Lockwood’s works, there is a rational basis to differentiate treatment for pit bulls as compared to other breeds of dogs.

My main point is this: Who is this person that is having their “pet” (their claim) pit bull cloned? Was it a companion animal, or possibly was it a winning fighter in the pit, and the “client” paying for another winning fighter that will bring them more than the $150K cost? Worse yet, a bitch to breed for multiple lines of pit fighters? What is the source of this information? What will happen next - imagine the worst of the worst of pit bulls being cloned to extend their genetic pre-disposition for these dangerous behaviors!

Pit Bull fighters are involved in an underground gambling network that involves millions and millions of dollars, and they are committed to getting the best possible fighters. Cloning of pit bulls that have won their owners hundreds of thousands of dollars will clearly be an economic viable option - especially if the possibility of then breeding the cloned bitch and selling them for 10 times the price of other pit bulls. Just as Dr. Lockwood has acknowledged that the occasional loosing pit bull is no longer automatically killed, but these dogs are leaking out upon the streets of America, where gang members use them to enhance their macho image and impromptu street fights, these pit bulls that are coming from the fighting pit are more likely to come into shelters, or come into the home of innocent victims.

The cloning of fighting breeds of dogs should be universally condemned as unethical, immoral, and simply too dangerous. Further, the possession, sale, or transportation of cloned dogs of fighting breeds should be prohibited by every state and the federal government. There is simply nothing unique about the positive characteristics of pit bulls that can morally or legally balance against the uniquely dangerous behaviors that have resulted in the infliction of horrific serious bodily injuries upon innocent victims, including children and the elderly.

The placement of such high emotional and irrational value upon pit bulls by their advocates must cause one to pause and ponder whether there is a hidden economic agenda behind those that cry and scream against breed specific legislation and go to such extremes as to vilify those Americans who stand up for the victims who have no voice. Rather than accept the rational rulings of the American system of jurisprudence, which the one thing rational Americans agree upon, Pit Bull breeders/fighters and owners must lie, distract, and provide misguided facts and analysis to support their personal agendas. This debate over dangerous pit bulls now must go to the federal government to impose bans against the cloning of pit bulls and the transportation, possession, and sale of cloned pit bulls.

I suggest that every rational American petition their federal representative to support such federal legislation.

Uh,
I don’t think we should be cloning, period.

As sad as it is,
it doesn’t bring the “real” dog/cat back. (I do hope they go to Heaven!!)

I agree w/ some of the others…
I would rather see her donate that money to charities so that it would go to a worthwhile cause.

Thanks for writing and please check back for new blogs!
Jamie

Jamie

Take care,
Jamie

Jamie

And Jamie…looking great on Fox these days…yeah for the short skirts..