FOXNews.com On The Scene

Separating the Fact From Fiction in the Yale Murder Case

One of the challenges in covering a fast-moving story like the murder of Yale grad student Annie Le is separating rumor from fact and getting confirmation of developments in time for our often hourly live on-the-air updates.

Many but not all of the rumors in this case have proven true, including the fact that a lab technician has emerged as the “person of interest”, which as far as I can tell is modern time’s politically correct terminology for “suspect”.

Rumors that proved untrue: Annie’s body was in the trash compactor, and the prime suspect was a student.

Things I’ve heard and have been reported but police won’t confirm: Raymond Clark had scratches on his chest and failed a lie detector test; the blood-stained clothes found in the lab are his; he was angry at Annie for her treatment of lab animals, specifically mice and exchanged emails with her about the issue.

We’ve worked more than 60 hours over the past four days and still have a few hours left on this shift. It seems every time we think we’re done for the night there’s a new development and we have to rush back on the job. We’re all pretty beat but committed to seeing this story through to it’s conclusion, hopefully the arrest of Annie’s killer.

At a news conference late this afternoon, New Haven Police Chief James Lewis sounded confident but careful. If there’s a DNA match to Clark, an arrest warrant will be issued within a couple hours and “we know where Clark is at all times.”

He also insisted there is no tunnel vision and they’re not ruling anyone else out yet.

A straight shooter, Lewis had a quick response to a question about a prominent lawyer suggesting the search and seizure warrant already served on Clark might be unconstitutional.

“You get three attorneys in a room,” the Chief said “you get five different opinions.”

Keep checking back to FOX News Channel for the latest on the case!

 

2 Responses to “Separating the Fact From Fiction in the Yale Murder Case”

Comment by sinazen

he emailed her about mice just as the excuse to get her to meet him; it was not a case of two people getting into a fight over laboratory mice

however, the defence may well use that as if it was the real reason, and plead self defence: they had an argument, and she attacked him first, causing those scratches; he then killed her in a rage; both sides would probably try to minimize the crime of passion angle; for the prosecution side, the girl already lost her life so one might as well minimize other damage

it appears he tried to cut up her body afterwards; what impact that would have on a jury is hard to tell; it might indicate hatred, his hardened nature, or he being easily panicked

 
Comment by John Hbier

There are some parallels between Ms. Le’s murder and the disappearance of UMBC student Tu Thi Cam Tran. However that happened pre-web, and to my knowledge, no one ever found out what happened to her or was charged with a crime. Ms. Tran was a young, beautiful Asian and student, but failed to be a wealthy Yale student worthy of FBI attention. What Federal crime was committed to bring in the Feds? Ms. Tran got a little of the campus police’s time before they gave up, that is all.

 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Close
E-mail It
Powered by WordPress This blog is powered by WordPress.com