Banning Smoking in Tobacco Country
Several restaurants and bars offer separate smoking and non-smoking areas. But all businesses might have to force smokers outside in North Carolina.
Virginia’s governor just signed a bill which pretty much bans smoking in most restaurants. They can offer smokers a spot in a separate room with a separate ventilation system, an expense most cannot afford. Meantime, a few miles south in Raleigh, the North Carolina legislature is looking at banning smoking in all public buildings and businesses in the Tarheel State. You might find it ironic that the latest states to consider such a measure were virtually built on the back of tobacco farmers. In fact, a few miles from the State Capitol in Richmond where the smoking ban was written and approved, Phillip Morris operates the largest cigarette factory in the world. And about 75 miles west of the state capitol in Raleigh, is the North Carolina headquarters of RJ Reynolds, another fixture in the tobacco business.
So why are two states with deep roots in the tobacco business banishing smokers to the patio? Simple, says North Carolina Representative Hugh Holliman, health and safety. The two-time lung cancer survivor is sponsoring the bill saying the non-smokers deserve a right to breathe in clean healthy air no matter where they go. Holliman points to polls conducted recently that show 65% of North Carolina residents support such a smoking ban. “I think people are more health conscious,” Holliman says. “They are aware of the fact that cigarette smoking and second-hand smoke are hazardous to your health.”
We talked to two business owners in Raleigh to see what they think about the proposed smoking ban. Greg Hatem, who owns The Raleigh Times Bar, says
The Raleigh Times Bar owner Greg Hatem doesn't believe a smoking ban will drive patrons away from his restaurant and bar as long as it applies to everyone.
he supports a ban as long as it includes all businesses. “People enjoy a smoke-free environment. I think even some of the smokers like to go outside and smoke,” Hatem says. “And as long as there is a level playing field, I think
it’s good for all the restaurants and bars.” Naill Hanley, who owns upscale restaurnt Solas, isn’t necessarily opposed to the ban. He agrees with Hatem that it should be for all businesses in North Carolina so as not to drive smokers from one business to another. But Hanley worries about government intrusion on private property rights. “I think it kind of belittles them in the sense that local government is telling them what they can or cannot do. What happens next? You are only allowed five drinks because it’s bad for your liver?” He thinks state-mandated smoking bans could open a door for more restrictions and laws.
Kathy Hartkpof agrees. She represents Freedom Works, a political activist group that fights government regulation. She says this proposed law is about property rights not smokers rights. “It’s about freedom and it’s about choice,” she says. “I am a non-smoker and I don’t care for cigarette smoke. I can choose to go into a restaurant, if I find it too smoky, I can choose to leave.” Hartkopf worries that Holliman’s proposal reaches beyond bars and restaurants and would even impact home-based businesses that have a few employees and no real customer traffic. She warns that truck drivers might even be prevented from smoking in their own trucks if the bill passes.
But Holliman is standing his ground and thinks this bill is best for North Carolina.
A business-owner himself, he doesn’t buy the argument that his bill would infringe on private property rights. He says local governments pass
Ironically, smoking bans are passing in states built largely on tobacco dollars. Smokers in Virginia and North Carolina could be pushed outside to light up.
health and safety regulations all the time, like mandating clearly marked and accessible fire exits. He believes his non-smoking bill will pass and protect the rights of all North Carolina residents, especially non-smokers who are exposed to cigarette smoke. “My mom used to have a saying when I was growing up that your rights end where another person’s rights start and I think this is what this bill is about.”