Many of you watched the Congressional hearings during which Roger Clemens and Brian McNamee each told their tale of whether or not Clemens used performance enhancing drugs. Now the FBI is being asked to investigate whether Roger Clemens lied under oath.

Overwhelmingly, you posted comments on the Colbyfiles that one or the other was lying. But I heard a theory - perhaps far-fetched - I want to run by you.

A fellow attorney suggested that McNamee may have injected Clemens with steroids (as he claims) but Clemens may not have known what he was being injected with. In that isolated case, each would in fact be telling the truth.

I admit it’s a long-shot and I’m not even sure the FBI would consider it. But two weeks after we heard and considered the testimony of both:

Who do you think is lying - Clemens or McNamee? Is there any chance they are both telling the truth?